Archive for September, 2004

Whittaker Associates Announcements

Thursday, September 30th, 2004

New Website: We are pleased to announce that we have just launched our brand new web site. Our new web site contains a new design, easier usability, better expalantions of our services, and updated content. The web site redesign was completed by Muller Design (www.mullerdesign.NET) out of Grand Rapids, Michigan. Please visit our new web site and let us know what you think.

Life is Change: It is rare in this age of rapid change to have the opportunity to work with a colleague for 15 years. Leigh Ann Howe joined Whittaker Associates 15 years ago as an intern while completing her undergraduate degree at Ball State University in Indiana. Ten years ago when I relocated the world headquarters of Whittaker Associates to Holland, Michigan, Leigh chose to relocate with us. It is with mixed feelings of sadness for me and joy for her that I report that Leigh will be leaving Whittaker Associates at the end of the month to return to her roots in Indiana. On behalf of myself, her colleagues with whom she has worked over the years, and the many clients that she has served I wish her well in her new endeavor. –Dean

2003 Headquarter Activity

Thursday, September 30th, 2004

by Pete Julius

Targeting company headquarters has been a popular strategy within economic development. As a result, we recently conducted a quick analysis of headquarter relocation and expansion activity across the country last year. The information was derived from Conway Scoreboard. As many of you know, Conway Scoreboard is a voluntary system to which companies submit an announcement when they expand or relocate. Therefore, we view the data contained in Conway Scoreboard as a sample. Some state organizations have sophisticated systems they use to track new and expanded activity. As a result, the numbers tracked by those systems may be different from those numbers derived from Conway. This article contains three different snapshots of headquarter expansion and relocation activity for 2003.

We first took a look at the states that had the most headquarter new and expanded announcements, regardless of industry. The table below includes states that had at least 10 announcements. New York, Florida and Virginia experienced the most activity in 2003. Interestingly enough, all but three of the states within the table are east of the Mississippi. Texas is the state farthest west in the table.

Most Active HQ Activity by State
(Minimum of 10 Announcements)
State
Number of Announcements
New York
76
Florida
70
Virginia
66
Illinois
56
Ohio
38
Michigan
36
Texas
34
Pennsylvania
30
Kentucky
20
Indiana
18
Minnesota
18
Georgia
16
North Carolina
12
Iowa
10

Next, we took a quick look at average investment by state, regardless of industry. Oklahoma, which was not in the previous table, is ranked number one. Massachusetts, Wisconsin, and South Dakota also appear in this table but not in the previous table. New York, which was number one in the previous table, reported the second highest average investment. Again, most of the activity occurred in the eastern United States.

Top Ten States by Most HQ Average Investment
State
Average Investment ($M)
Oklahoma
$67.0
New York
$52.8
Massachusetts
$38.7
Wisconsin
$36.0
Texas
$22.8
Michigan
$19.6
Indiana
$18.8
South Dakota
$15.0
Ohio
$12.3
Illinois
$12.2

Finally, we shifted focus and looked at the most active industries by NAICS code. Each NAICS code listed in the table below had at least 10 announcements. Professional, scientific, and technical service by far had the most announcements.

Most Active HQ Activity by NAICS Code
(Minimum of 10 Announcements)
NAICS Code – Description
Number
541 – Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 132
522 – Credit Intermediation & Related Activities 32
233 – Building, Developing & General Contracting 26
524 – Insurance Carriers & Related Activities 26
561 – Administrative & Support Services 26
551 – Management of Companies & Enterprises 24
334 – Computer & Electronic Product Mfg. 22
336 – Transportation Equipment Mfg. 18
523 – Security, Commodity Contracts & Like Activity 18
325 – Chemical Manufacturing 16
221 – Utilities 10
333 – Machinery Manufacturing 10
339 – Miscellaneous Mfg. (including medical related industries) 10
422 – Wholesale Trade, Nondurable Goods 10
513 – Broadcasting & Telecommunications 10
521 – Monetary Authorities – Central Bank 10
531 – Real Estate 10

Welcome to Mars–Please Keep Your Hands Inside the Vehicle

Thursday, September 30th, 2004

by Leigh Ann Howe

Suborbital Tourism. Touring space has been a dream of many since Apollo 11 landed on the moon in 1969. Now just 35 years later, the race to get commercial space tourism is off the ground as private enterprises are moving quickly towards launch dates. And the competition for commercial space tourism seems to be heating up.

The Contenders:

  • SpaceShipOne, backed by billionaire Paul Allen and designed by aeronautical engineer Burt Rutan, will take its inaugural flight on September 29th. If all goes well, the second launch will follow on October 4th. The test flight on June 21st went well – climbing 62 miles to the edge of the earth’s atmosphere.
  • The da Vinci Project, based in Toronto, has its first launch date scheduled for October 2nd. They are already working on an 8 person vehicle that should be ready in 2006.
  • Canadian Arrow in London, Ontario is also a contender. This team is scheduled to launch its rocket before year end.
  • Space Transport Corp. is running behind after their test of an unmanned rocket ended up in the Pacific Ocean in August.
  • Armadillo Aerospace has also suffered setbacks due to a crash after a test launch.

A Window Seat, Please. It may be a while before you can book your space flight on Orbitz, but the test flight has gone so well for SpaceShipOne that suborbital tourism may become reality soon. However, the ticket prices are sure to be quite shocking for a while. And it isn’t the technology that is slowing the process down, but politics. Congress would have to clear the way to grant launches from a U.S. licensed commercial spaceport. Right now for example, it costs about $200,000 per launch to use the White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico. It will be quite interesting to see what the next 35 years brings.

Commercial Aircraft Trends

Thursday, September 30th, 2004

by Jeff Vedders

Last month I looked at trends within the food industry. Another target for a lot of communities is aerospace and defense. Often the industry is defined as commercial aircraft, the defense industry, and the space industry. This month I will look at the commercial aircraft sector. Next month I will focus on the defense and space industry.

The events of September 11 have made a long and lasting impact on the commercial aircraft industry. In addition to the terrorist attacks, the commercial aircraft sector has been hard hit by the war on terrorism, the weak economy, global epidemics (SARs), and rising oil prices. The good news is the worst of the past few years declining earnings and profits may be over. Profits may be on the upswing due to expected increases in passenger traffic and financial benefits from recent restructurings and layoffs. There has also been an increase in jet orders. However, since it takes 18 months to make a plane, higher sales and earnings will probably not be seen until mid-2005. As airlines continue to focus on short-haul routes operated by their regional subsidiaries, orders for smaller, regional jets are expected to increase. All in all, long term growth trends within the commercial aircraft industry are fairly modest. The main driver for large jet demand is airline profitability, and it is expected to remain weak for the next few years. The airline industry is mature, with high fixed-operating costs, large capital expenditure requirements, and high competition. Expansion of air-traffic is also tied to overall economic growth. The stronger the economy, the greater the likelihood businesses and consumers will use their discretionary income for air travel. Overall economic growth is predicted to be sluggish.

Source: Standard and Poor’s Industry Surveys, “Aerospace and Defense,” Robert E. Friedman, April 15, 2004