Posts Tagged ‘Conway Data’

Mega Projects in the First Half of 2011

Sunday, July 31st, 2011

By Vidhan Rana

In a slow economy, many may wonder where all the projects are happening. (more…)

Project Activity Remains Slow as Corporate Profits Increase

Tuesday, November 30th, 2010

By Vidhan Rana

According to the U.S. Commerce Department, corporate profits in the country hit an all-time high of $1.659 trillion in the latest quarter. (more…)

With Growth in U.S. Solar Industry, International Solar Companies Target the U.S. Market

Wednesday, June 30th, 2010

By Vidhan Rana

For many years, Europe appeared to be at the forefront of the solar industry. Most of the world’s major manufacturers were located there, and most of the sales happened in Europe as well. (more…)

Will New and Expanded Intensify in 2006?

Monday, January 30th, 2006

by Pete Julius

Since 2000, new and expanded facility activity has plummeted. This downward spiral has made it extremely difficult for communities to recruit and retain businesses. During this recession, most economic development organizations also witnessed a huge decline in their annual budgets. Simultaneous with these budget decreases, pressure mounted to be more successful with less resources. Globalization has also had a devastating effect on a lot of communities with its demand for higher skilled employees; many communities have been left with an available labor force that possesses unusable skills. The chart below illustrates the dramatic decline in new expanded announcements from 1999-2005.

Source: Conway Data Scoreboard & Whittaker Associates, Inc.

It must be noted that the 2005 numbers are for January – November 2005. All companies within this chart have at least $5 million in sales and a minimum of 25 employees. It is anticipated that the remaining number of new and expanded announcements in December will not be significant enough to actually cause an increase over last year. However, it is possible that the number of expanded facility announcements could actually increase for the first time since 1999 and 2000. An increase in expanded facilities, as well as an increase in new announcements, could provide some momentum for 2006, provided that our healthy economy stays strong. However, the increase will not be significant. This country will continue to lose jobs to overseas’ competition. The jobs that will stay in the U.S. will require higher skills because the work that will continue to go overseas will be commodity and routine-based jobs. We developed a table to gain more insight into which particular industries have been the most active.

The table contains new facility and expanded facility announcements from 1999 to 2005. The table includes industries that announced a minimum of 100 new and expanded facility projects. Each company also contains the same minimum-size companies as those in the chart above. The industries are separated by their three-digit NAICS codes. Even though this table is helpful, it would be much useful if the industries were broken out by more than 3-digit NAICS codes. Nonetheless, it does shed some light on new and expanded activity over the past 7 years.

1999-2005 New Announcements 1999-2005 Expanded Announcements
NAICS NAICS Description Total NAICS NAICS Description Total
541 Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 1,550 336 Transportation Equipment 2,130
336 Transportation Equipment 1,325 332 Fabricated Metal Product 1,276
421 Wholesale Trade, Durable Goods 938 326 Plastics & Rubber 1,238
325 Chemical Manufacturing 873 325 Chemical Manufacturing 1,236
334 Computer & Electronic Product 851 311 Food Manufacturing 1,234
333 Machinery Manufacturing 795 541 Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 1,181
311 Food Manufacturing 752 333 Machinery Manufacturing 1,151
326 Plastics & Rubber 729 334 Computer & Electronic Product 825
332 Fabricated Metal Product 701 331 Primary Metal Fabrication 810
493 Warehousing & Storage 637 322 Paper Manufacturing 602
422 Wholesale Trade, Nondurable Goods 624 421 Wholesale Trade, Durable Goods 590
513 Broadcasting & Telecommunications 471 335 Electrical Equip., Appliance & Component Mfg. 554
339 Miscellaneous Manufacturing 456 321 Wood Product Manufacturing 487
331 Primary Metal Fabrication 418 422 Wholesale Trade, Nondurable Goods 477
321 Wood Product Manufacturing 395 327 Nonmetallic Mineral Product Mfg. 456
514 Information Services & Data Processing 371 323 Printing & Related Support Activities 450
327 Nonmetallic Mineral Product Mfg. 369 233 Building Dev. & General Contracting 441
335 Electrical Equip., Appliance & Component Mfg. 360 337 Furniture & Related Product Mfg. 429
561 Administrative & Support Services 344 339 Miscellaneous Manufacturing 428
524 Insurance Carriers & Related Activities 333 513 Broadcasting & Telecommunications 356
337 Furniture & Related Product Mfg. 330 493 Warehousing & Storage 266
221 Utilities 327 561 Administrative & Support Services 266
322 Paper Manufacturing 287 313 Textile Mills 263
484 Truck Transportation 284 484 Truck Transportation 214
523 Securities, Commodities, Contracts & Other Fin. 256 514 Information Services & Data Processing 213
522 Credit Intermediation & Related Activities 248 524 Insurance Carriers & Related Activities 204
323 Printing & Related Support Activities 247 522 Credit Intermediation & Related Activities 175
531 Real Estate 217 312 Beverage & Tobacco Product Mfg. 170
511 Publishing Industries 170 315 Apparel Manufacturing 157
315 Apparel Manufacturing 159 324 Petroleum & Coal Products Mfg. 152
488 Transportation Support Activities 138 314 Textile Product Mills 151
452 General Merchandise Stores 120 511 Publishing Industries 134
312 Beverage & Tobacco Product Mfg. 118 523 Securities, Commodities, Contracts & Other Fin. 113
481 Air Transportation 108
444 Bldg Material & Garden Equip & Supply Dealers 106

Source: Conway Data Scoreboard & Whittaker Associates, Inc.

Headquarter Relocation Activity

Saturday, July 30th, 2005

by Pete Julius

Headquarter relocation strategies are an effective and efficient way to recruit talent into a community, if properly planned and executed. Many economic development organizations across the country have adopted some sort of headquarter strategy. They salivate over the types of jobs that a new headquarter relocation would bring to their respective communities. For starters, employees at a headquarter location are typically well paid. This is due to the high level of skill sets, education and training required for the types of positions that exist at a headquarter facility. In addition to generating jobs, the relocation of a company’s high-level executives and managers to the new headquarter location is economically appealing. Of course, headquarter facilities also generate a lot of revenue that winds up circulating in the local economy.

According to Conway Data Scoreboard, a total of 1,651 businesses have relocated their headquarters to brand-new facilities from 1999-2005 (first quarter). This number does not include headquarter expansions. The table below provides a list of the top ten industries establishing new headquarter facilities between 1999 and the 1 st quarter of 2005. All announcements in the table represent an investment of at least $1 million, 50 employees, or 20,000 square feet. Most of the activity has occurred in service-and knowledge-based industries. Only four of the industries in the table are manufacturing-based.

NAICS NAICS Code Description # of Announcements
541 Professional & Scientific Services 277
334 Computer & Electronic Product Mfg. 104
336 Transportation Equip. Mfg. 68
325 Chemical Mfg. 64
524 Insurance Carriers & Related Activities 56
514 Information Services and Data Processing Services 52
513 Broadcasting and Telecommunications 51
333 Machinery Mfg. 49
522 Credit Intermediate & Related Activities 49
523 Securities Contracts & Investments 41

Headquarter recruitment strategies are a little more difficult than traditional business recruitment. For starters, there are far fewer headquarter relocations than any other type of relocation, whether it be a manufacturing, office, service or warehousing and distribution facility. As a result, headquarter recruitment strategies require a lot of work and patience, an important realization for anyone thinking of giving them a try. Headquarter relocations are typically very unorthodox and must be kept confidential because of the risks associated with moving a headquarters.

As with other recruitment strategies, communities must first understand their strengths, weaknesses, assets, challenges, needs, desires and competitive advantages before attempting to recruit a company’s headquarters. Essentially, you will need to create a profile of the type of company headquarters that you would like to recruit into your community. More importantly, this profile should also include the feasibility of recruiting such a facility. The best way to start to compile this profile is to look at your most recent targeted-industry study. The industries recommended in the study, if done properly, represent the industries with the greatest potential success for a business-recruitment strategy. Once the profile is complete, make sure that you have a sound implementation plan, and remember that this will be a long-term strategy. One of the most difficult but rewarding challenges is to develop solid, trusting relationships with both the executive in charge of the headquarter relocation and the company itself.

Six Year New & Expanded Activity

Wednesday, March 30th, 2005

by Pete Julius

The winners of the 2004 Governor’s Cup were just announced in the latest issue of Site Selection Magazine . For the sixth time since 1978, Texas is number one with 668 facility announcements. Michigan , Ohio , New York and Illinois round out the top five. All new and expanded facility announcements consisted of at least $1 million in investment, a minimum of 50 employees and at least 20,000 square feet. In response to this article, we took a closer look at new and expanded activity over the past six years. The following table compares overall average investment, employment and square footage for new and expanded projects from 1999-2004.

Year Total Number of Projects Average Investment ($M) Average Employment Average Square Footage (1,000s)
Expanded
1999 4,643 $10.1 64 37
2000 5,036 $11.6 69 35
2001 4,369 $10.6 61 38
2002 3,355 $12.1 91 83
2003 2,734 $13.5 90 84
2004 3,258 $13.2 94 90
Expanded 23,395 $11.5 73 48
New
1999 5,845 $13.5 58 92
2000 6,554 $13.8 55 97
2001 5,239 $17.2 63 119
2002 3,298 $17.4 91 135
2003 2,798 $20.8 100 130
2004 2,698 $24.9 114 123
New 26,432 $16.3 69 109
Grand Total – New & Expanded 49,827 $14.0 71 83
Source: Conway Data & Whittaker Associates, Inc.

Facility expansion projects in 2004 increased in the total number of projects, average employment and square footage from the previous year. During the same time period, new facility projects increased in investment, employment and square footage. New and expanded activity is still nowhere near the levels of 99-01 but these figures show some promise in the recovery of our national economy. The table below compares two different time periods: 1999-2001 and 2002-2004.

Year Total Number of Projects Average Investment ($M) Average Employment Average Square Footage (1,000s)
Expanded
1999-2001 14,048 $10.8 65 36
2002-2004 9,347 $13.0 91 257
Expanded 23,395 $11.5 73 48
New
1999-2001 17,638 $14.8 59 103
2002-2004 8,794 $21.0 102 129
New 26,432 $16.3 69 109

Source: Conway Data & Whittaker Associates, Inc.

The number of new and expanded announcements in these two time periods is drastically different. There were twice as many new facility announcements from 1999 to 2001 than there were during the time period from 2002 to 2004. There were approximately 5,000 new facility projects in 1999 to 2001 than there were from 2002 to 2004. It is also interesting to point out that average investment, employment and square footage were all higher for new and expanded activity from 2002 to 2004 than the time frame from 1999 to 2001. This point illustrates that there are far fewer new and expanded announcements in the past three years, but the projects are bigger. This is a great sign and is an indication that the economy may finally be turning around.

2003 Headquarter Activity

Thursday, September 30th, 2004

by Pete Julius

Targeting company headquarters has been a popular strategy within economic development. As a result, we recently conducted a quick analysis of headquarter relocation and expansion activity across the country last year. The information was derived from Conway Scoreboard. As many of you know, Conway Scoreboard is a voluntary system to which companies submit an announcement when they expand or relocate. Therefore, we view the data contained in Conway Scoreboard as a sample. Some state organizations have sophisticated systems they use to track new and expanded activity. As a result, the numbers tracked by those systems may be different from those numbers derived from Conway. This article contains three different snapshots of headquarter expansion and relocation activity for 2003.

We first took a look at the states that had the most headquarter new and expanded announcements, regardless of industry. The table below includes states that had at least 10 announcements. New York, Florida and Virginia experienced the most activity in 2003. Interestingly enough, all but three of the states within the table are east of the Mississippi. Texas is the state farthest west in the table.

Most Active HQ Activity by State
(Minimum of 10 Announcements)
State
Number of Announcements
New York
76
Florida
70
Virginia
66
Illinois
56
Ohio
38
Michigan
36
Texas
34
Pennsylvania
30
Kentucky
20
Indiana
18
Minnesota
18
Georgia
16
North Carolina
12
Iowa
10

Next, we took a quick look at average investment by state, regardless of industry. Oklahoma, which was not in the previous table, is ranked number one. Massachusetts, Wisconsin, and South Dakota also appear in this table but not in the previous table. New York, which was number one in the previous table, reported the second highest average investment. Again, most of the activity occurred in the eastern United States.

Top Ten States by Most HQ Average Investment
State
Average Investment ($M)
Oklahoma
$67.0
New York
$52.8
Massachusetts
$38.7
Wisconsin
$36.0
Texas
$22.8
Michigan
$19.6
Indiana
$18.8
South Dakota
$15.0
Ohio
$12.3
Illinois
$12.2

Finally, we shifted focus and looked at the most active industries by NAICS code. Each NAICS code listed in the table below had at least 10 announcements. Professional, scientific, and technical service by far had the most announcements.

Most Active HQ Activity by NAICS Code
(Minimum of 10 Announcements)
NAICS Code – Description
Number
541 – Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 132
522 – Credit Intermediation & Related Activities 32
233 – Building, Developing & General Contracting 26
524 – Insurance Carriers & Related Activities 26
561 – Administrative & Support Services 26
551 – Management of Companies & Enterprises 24
334 – Computer & Electronic Product Mfg. 22
336 – Transportation Equipment Mfg. 18
523 – Security, Commodity Contracts & Like Activity 18
325 – Chemical Manufacturing 16
221 – Utilities 10
333 – Machinery Manufacturing 10
339 – Miscellaneous Mfg. (including medical related industries) 10
422 – Wholesale Trade, Nondurable Goods 10
513 – Broadcasting & Telecommunications 10
521 – Monetary Authorities – Central Bank 10
531 – Real Estate 10

New & Expanded Announcements

Saturday, February 28th, 2004

By Jeff Vedders

We recently analyzed US new facility and expanded facility activity for 2003.  There were a total of 5,427 announcements in 2003.  This compares with 6,645 announcements in 2002, 9,679 announcements in 2001 and 11,602 announcements in 2000.  That means there was a 22% drop in activity from 2002 to 2003, and there was a 53% drop in activity from 2000 to 2003.  All announcements represent an investment of $1 million, 50 employees, or 20,000 sq. ft.

Source: Whittaker Associates, Inc. and Conway Data Scoreboard

Of the 6,645 announcements reported for 2002, 2,720 were new facility announcements while 2,707 were expanded facility announcements.

2002 Top New Facility Announcements Analysis

As can be seen below, most of the top industries dropped off in activity from 2002 to 2003.  Computer and electronic product manufacturing leads all categories with a drop off of 44%.  Although much of the new activity is down, there are still a few categories that remain active and are increasing in activity.  Interestingly, after a drop-off of 78% between 2001 and 2002, building, developing, & general contracting (spec properties) is up nearly 96% over 2002 levels.  Truck transportation facilities and wholesale trade, nondurable goods are up over 2002 levels.

2003 New Announcements 2002 New Announcements Percentage Change NAICS Code NAICS Description
479 245 95.51% 233 Building, developing, & general contracting
188 272 -30.88% 421 Wholesale trade, durable goods
156 186 -16.13% 541 Professional, scientific & technical services
146 200 -27.00% 336 Transportation equipment manufacturing
123 142 -13.38% 325 Chemical manufacturing
112 97 15.46% 422 Wholesale trade, nondurable goods
97 122 -20.49% 721 Accommodation
92 130 -29.23% 311 Food manufacturing
92 109 -15.60% 326 Plastics & rubber products manufacturing
69 109 -36.70% 333 Machinery manufacturing
68 91 -25.27% 332 Fabricated metal products manufacturing
58 104 -44.23% 334 Computer & electronic product manufacturing
56 69 -18.84% 331 Primary metal manufacturing
55 48 14.58% 561 Administrative & support services
52 23 126.09% 484 Truck transportation

Source: Whittaker Associates, Inc. and Conway Data Scoreboard

2002 Top Expanded Facility Announcements Analysis

As with the new announcements, most of the top industries dropped significantly in activity from 2002 to 2003.  Printing and related support activity, machinery manufacturing, and wholesale trade, durable goods lead all categories with drop offs of 35%, 34% and 34% respectively.  Categories showing a significant increase include building, developing, & general contracting and truck transportation (558% and 100%).

2003 Expanded Announcements 2002 Expanded Announcements Percentage Change NAICS Code NAICS Description
263 364 -27.75% 336 Transportation equipment manufacturing
185 219 -15.53% 311 Food manufacturing
180 207 -13.04% 325 Chemical manufacturing
171 150 14.00% 541 Professional, scientific, & technical services
152 218 -30.28% 326 Plastics & rubber products manufacturing
133 177 -24.86% 332 Fabricated metal product manufacturing
116 176 -34.09% 333 Machinery manufacturing
107 162 -33.95% 421 Wholesale trade, durable goods
89 129 -31.01% 331 Primary metal manufacturing
80 86 -6.98% 422 Wholesale trade, nondurable goods
79 12 558.33% 233 Building, developing, & general contracting
69 98 -29.59% 334 Computer & electronic product manufacturing
66 73 -9.59% 335 Electrical equipment, appliance & component mfg
64 59 8.47% 337 Furniture & related product manufacturing
58 73 -20.55% 321 Wood product manufacturing
53 73 -27.40% 327 Nonmetallic mineral product manufacturing
51 71 -28.17% 339 Miscellaneous manufacturing
50 77 -35.06% 323 Printing & related support activities
50 25 100.00% 484 Truck transportation

Source: Whittaker Associates, Inc. and Conway Data Scoreboard

A Look at the Plastics Industry

Wednesday, July 30th, 2003

By Jeff Vedders

Plastics, or miscellaneous plastics products as it’s formally known, is one of our most requested industry targets.  No wonder.  According to a recent study by The Society of the Plastics Industry, Inc. (SPI), in terms of shipments, miscellaneous plastics products is the fourth largest manufacturing industry in the United States after motor vehicles and equipment, electronic components and accessories, and petroleum refining.  In fact, the plastics industry is actually larger, since many automotive and electronics components utilize plastics.  SPI’s most recent statistics claim nearly 21,000 businesses employing 2.4 million people, about 2 percent of the entire workforce.  California has the most businesses, with 2,368.  The next closest state is Michigan, with 1,334 businesses.

While plastics companies can locate anywhere, they require close geographic proximity to their markets, dependable energy, and a low-cost, skilled and dependable workforce.  Notable plastics companies include Crown Holdings, Inc., GE Plastics, Cooper Tire & Rubber Company, Ball Corporation, and Sealed Air Corporation.

Although the plastics industry has not been immune to the overall U.S. manufacturing downturn, some sectors continue to perform well.  Plastics packaging, particularly in the food and beverage sector, is outpacing other materials such as glass, metal, and paper.  In fact, in the food industry, plastics is growing at a rate more than twice that of metal, while in the beverage industry the growth rate of plastics is 6 percent annually, while metal and glass are growing at 1 percent.  The market for plastics materials and resins in the U.S. is expected to grow 16.5% between 2002 and 2006, reaching a value of $57.7 billion in 2006.  Much of the sales increase over the forecast period is expected to result from the development of specialty materials, particularly in the automotive and packaging industries.  Aside from packaging, another large plastics sector is the construction industry.  Large residential housing has slowed somewhat, as have road construction projects, but there is still activity in the small residential housing market, which uses more vinyl.

A look at recent new and expanded facility announcement activity between 1999 and 2000 demonstrates that while not being anywhere near 2000 levels, the industry does appear to have leveled off.  In fact there was an increase in expansion activity between 2001 and 2002.  This may suggest that excess capacity issues have been resolved within the industry.

Sources: 

º    “Growth Forecast for All Packaging Resins in 2003.”  Packaging Strategies v 21, n 2, p s4, Jan 31, 2003

º    “Industry proves adaptable to change in manufacturing downturn plastics: plastics have the unique capability to be manufactured to meet very specific functional needs for consumers.”  Clint Johnson, Plants Sites & Parks v 29, n 4, p 74 (7), September 2002.

º    The Society of the Plastics Industry, Inc. Washington, D.C., www.socplas.org

º    “Plastics Materials and Resins in the USA.”  June 2002.  Euromonitor.

º    Conway Data Scoreboard and Whittaker Associates, Inc.

Projects, Projects, Projects – Where Are They?

Wednesday, July 30th, 2003

By Pete Julius

Over the past few years we’ve seen a significant drop in the number of new and expanded facility activities.  Of course, when you compare that to the mid 90’s, when the economy was growing by leaps and bounds, anything below that level of activity seems dismal.  We all know that these are challenging times for everyone, but what does the future hold for economic development, and what can we expect?

I recently called upon 31 of our current and past clients to get their perspectives on the current and future nature of prospecting activity.  In conjunction with these calls, this article contains information obtained through our work and interactions with economic developers and fellow consultants.  This article will discuss current and future trends in prospecting activity, including the status of corporate real estate investments, understanding why companies are making real estate investments or why they aren’t, and, given the current and perceived future state, what economic developers can do in the meantime to stay competitive.           

Overall, real estate investment activity is still struggling and it appears this will continue for quite some time.  Too many domestic and international issues are stalling corporate decisions.  Sure, there are some areas that are seeing various degrees of activity, but for the most part corporate America seems to be procrastinating.  In addition, a roller coaster effect is at work.  Economic developers indicate that activity will pick up one quarter and then the very next quarter it will plummet once again.  To make matters even more unpredictable, some communities will see activity one quarter, while other communities will see activity in the next.  These signs seem to suggest mass confusion and a large level of uncertainty within corporate America.  So what is causing this mess?

A vast number of factors are playing major roles.  The most obvious one is the economy.  The jobless rate continues to rise, the stock market is struggling to regain prominence, and the dollar has lost a lot of its luster and appeal.  Of course more than just the economy provides reasons to hesitate.  World events are also playing a huge role.  The war in Iraq, post-war Iraq, ongoing threats of terrorism, and SARS have all impacted decision-making in corporate America.  In addition, we continue to lose a large number of manufacturing operations to China and Mexico.  This issue affects not only those companies directly involved, but also companies and whole industries that depend on those businesses that move their operations overseas.  Another factor is the airline industry.  The state and potential fate of the airline industry has had a ripple effect on many industries.  The airline industry greatly affects how companies operate.  The slowdown and lack of business travel has slowed the decision-making process.  Despite all of these obstacles, however, some companies are moving forward with their real estate investments.

So what are the driving forces behind this brave new investment activity? First, low interest rates have enticed many companies to make real estate investments.  The lowered risk on investments associated with decreased interest rates have motivated many companies to expand or relocate.  Second, a lot of the activity has come from companies that have particular needs other than growth.  For instance, some companies have established a new facility just to be closer to a major customer or supplier.  Third, companies that put their expansion and relocation plans on hold several years ago to sit out what was initially thought to be a short recession just couldn’t wait any longer.  These companies had a particular need but were hesitant to a make a decision because of so much uncertainty.  After waiting for so long, they realized that they needed to act before it was too late.  And of course, even in tough times, there is always going to be someone who will prosper.  Even in the Great Depression, while many suffered, some people benefited.  OK, so if there is real estate investment activity, then where is it happening?           

For the most part, the limited amount of activity seems to be scattered over a wide range of industries and locations.  However, a few industries stand out.  Distribution and back office operations appear to be the most active industries.  In addition, food processing and plastics are also active.  Most of the activity is coming from small- to mid-size companies.  Why? One very important reason is that small- to mid-sized companies feature entrepreneurial risk takers.  In this time of vast uncertainty, companies need to take risks to grow.  Since small and mid-sized companies are filled with risk takers, it is only natural that the activity would come from these companies.  In addition there are many more small- to mid-sized companies than there are mammoth companies in corporate America.

Given these tough times, what has worked around the economic development community, and what can you do in your own community to stay competitive?

Focus is one of the most important elements for staying competitive.  Are you currently focusing your marketing efforts on the appropriate targets? Are you attempting to attract businesses that make sense for your area and not just attempting to attract certain industries because they are active, regardless of whether they make sense for your area? To do this effectively, you must understand the challenges and needs of your existing businesses.  What is causing some area companies to struggle? What is needed to help them prosper? What is it that successful companies are doing that may help those who are struggling? By understanding the challenges and needs of your existing companies, you can focus your efforts on recruiting the businesses that make sense for your community. 

To remain competitive, it is absolutely critical to remain aggressive and unique in your marketing efforts.  You need to get in front of the right people with the right message, even if the time is not right for them.  Timing is always a difficult issue to gauge.  Just because a company is not currently wrapped up in a project does not mean that they will not have one in the future.  Additionally, getting in front of them before they have a project helps to create a competitive advantage for your organization and community. When the project does come about, then you will have already provided them with ample information on your area and will have cemented the image of your community as ideal for a new location.  Of course tax abatements and other financial incentives are nice, but they are not the only criteria in the site-selection decision process.  It is more important to be proactive and compelling in selling your area.  Sure, it is tougher sell for small- and medium-sized communities, especially during periods with lower levels of corporate real estate activity.  It just means that you need to be a little more compelling and creative with your message.

Please, feel free to respond with any additional comments.